Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWessels, Jan-Albert
dc.contributor.authorMostert, Ruan Samson Colyn
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-17T10:44:33Z
dc.date.available2014-10-17T10:44:33Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/11851
dc.descriptionM Environmental Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014en_US
dc.description.abstractCurrently the entire South African industry of Environmental Control Officers (ECOs) is unregulated, yet ECOs have the important task of checking and verifying compliance to environmental regulatory and performance requirements. According to international best practice principles for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), the process should be made credible through independent checks and verification (IAIA, 1999:3). According to the Environmental Impact Assessment Management Strategy Subtheme 5, quality assurance can only be attained when practitioners fulfill competence and ethical practice criteria. In this document the South African Department of Environmental Affairs (SADEA) also noted that there is currently no home for ECOs, yet this is where effective monitoring and enforcement could significantly improve environmental outcomes. The central objective of this dissertation was to investigate the need for regulation of the South African ECO industry. Data obtained from the questionnaires indicated that 100% of respondents were in agreement that there is a need for regulation of the South African ECO industry. One of the key motivational factors identified by respondents was quality assurance, which is important, as the environmental legislative regime changes constantly. Various other factors were identified other than quality assurance and were labelled “drivers”. These include establishment of minimum standards in respect of qualifications and/or experience (core competencies), establishment of a professional code of conduct and ethics that enhances accountability and professionalism, skills improvement through continual professional development (CPD), enhancement of credibility, independence of practitioners, enhancement of skills for capacity building, protection of clients against substandard work and overall lack of professionalism, and finally creation of a source of information support and interaction. It was important to determine what drives the regulation of an industry, in order to establish whether the South African ECO industry has similar drivers justifying regulation. The establishment of qualification and competency requirements was an important objective of this research, as a set of these requirements is an essential toolkit for operating ECOs and key stakeholders of the industry. Various registration and competence requirements for ECOs were identified from the literature review and responses to the questionnaires and interviews. With this research the author also intended to establish which current accreditation bodies could be considered for registration of ECOs and regulation of the South African ECO industry. The dissertation concludes by emphasising the importance of regulating the South African ECO industry, as this will ensure that compliance monitoring takes place effectively.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectECOen_US
dc.subjectCompliance monitoringen_US
dc.subjectRegulationen_US
dc.subjectMotivational driversen_US
dc.subjectCompetence requirementsen_US
dc.subjectRegistration requirementsen_US
dc.subjectAccreditation bodyen_US
dc.subjectOBBen_US
dc.subjectNakomingsmoniteringen_US
dc.subjectReguleringen_US
dc.subjectMotiversingsdrywersen_US
dc.subjectVaardigheidsvereistesen_US
dc.subjectRegistrasievereistesen_US
dc.subjectReguleringsliggaamen_US
dc.titleInvestigating the need for regulation of the South African environmental control officer industryen
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US
dc.contributor.researchID11832509 - Wessels, Johannes Albertus (Supervisor)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record