Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHolness, Willene
dc.contributor.authorRule, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-04T09:34:37Z
dc.date.available2015-02-04T09:34:37Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationHolness, W. & Rule, S. 2014. Barriers to advocacy and litigation in the equality courts for persons with disabilities. Potchefstroom electronic law journal (PELJ) = Potchefstroomse elektroniese regsblad (PER), 17(5):1907-1963 [http://www.nwu.ac.za/p-per/index.html]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/13309
dc.description.abstractThe effective implementation of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 (PEPUDA) and the fulfilment of the South African state's obligations in terms of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) are dependent on two fundamental tools, advocacy and litigation. This article discusses the outcome of three cases in the Equality Courts and how these cases promote accessibility and access to justice for persons with disabilities. The authors then consider the impact of CREATE, a KwaZulu-Natal NGO's advocacy initiatives to promote the rights of persons with disabilities and the utilisation of the Equality Court to realise those rights. Participants of ten workshops in KwaZulu-Natal identified three barriers to access to justice in accessing the Equality Courts. Firstly, some Equality Courts are geographically (and financially) inaccessible. Secondly, the negative and insensitive attitudes of front-line workers impact on the ability of persons with disabilities to bring equality claims to and access the services of the Equality Court. These barriers constitute discrimination and flout articles 9 and 13 of the CRPD, which require the provision of support for persons with disabilities to access the justice system and the promotion of accessibility to the physical environment, and the provision to them of transportation, information and other services. Thirdly, cultural norms and fears impede access to courts and the agency of persons with disabilities to bring these claims, for example the requirement that traditional leaders provide "permission" to persons with disabilities to sue and a similar requirement of permission from the in-laws of women with disabilities. The article analyses the three barriers identified as inhibiting advocacy and litigation, and explains the implication of these barriers for the state's obligations in terms of articles 5, 8, 9, 12 and 13 of the CRPD. Recommendations are made on overcoming these barriers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectDisabilityen_US
dc.subjectEqualityen_US
dc.subjectAccessibilityen_US
dc.subjectAccess to justiceen_US
dc.subjectAdvocacyen_US
dc.subjectLitigationen_US
dc.subjectEquality Courtsen_US
dc.subjectConvention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilitiesen_US
dc.titleBarriers to advocacy and litigation in the equality courts for persons with disabilitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record