mirage

The protection of fundamental rights in the Netherlands and South Africa compared: can the many differences be justified?

Boloka/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van der Schyff, G
dc.date.accessioned 2009-03-20T08:14:34Z
dc.date.available 2009-03-20T08:14:34Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier.issn 1727-3781
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10394/1773
dc.description.abstract This contribution considers the protection of fundamental rights in the Netherlands and South Africa. Both countries strive to be constitutional democracies that respect basic rights. But both countries go about this aim in very different ways. These different paths to constitutionalism are compared, as well as the reasons for these differences and whether it can be said that these differences are justifiable. This is done by comparing the character of the rights guaranteed in the Dutch and South African legal orders, the sources of these rights and the locus or centre of protection in both systems. The conclusion is reached that no single or perfect route to attaining the desired protection of fundamental rights exists, but that one should always enquire as to the state of individual freedom and the right to make free political choices in measuring the worth of a system's protection of rights. en
dc.subject comparative fundamental rights en
dc.title The protection of fundamental rights in the Netherlands and South Africa compared: can the many differences be justified? en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search the NWU Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics