Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDe Waal, D.A.
dc.contributor.authorCampher, Susanna Elisabeth Sophia
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-06T09:16:17Z
dc.date.available2009-07-06T09:16:17Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/2025
dc.descriptionThesis (M.Sc. (Computer Science))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.
dc.description.abstractIn this dissertation generalised additive neural networks (GANNs), decision trees and alternating conditional expectations (ACE) are studied and compared as computerised techniques in the field of predictive data mining. De Waal and Du Toit (2003) developed the automated construction of GANNs called AutoGANN. The aim is to better understand the contribution that this new technology may bring to the field of data mining. Decision trees and ACE were chosen as comparative techniques since both have been praised for their performance as data analysis tools. The ACE, AutoGANN and decision tree modelling methods are explained and applied to several regression problems. The methods and empirical results are compared and discussed in terms of criteria such as predictive capability or accuracy, novelty, utility, interpretability and stability. Finally, the conclusion is made that the AutoGANN system should contribute substantially to the field of data mining.
dc.publisherNorth-West University
dc.subjectAlternating conditional expectationsen
dc.subjectArtificial neural networksen
dc.subjectData miningen
dc.subjectDecision treesen
dc.subjectGeneralised additive modelsen
dc.subjectPredictive modelsen
dc.subjectRegressionen
dc.subjectSmootheren
dc.titleComparing generalised additive neural networks with decision trees and alternating conditional expectationsen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.description.thesistypeMasters


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record