Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSelck, Henriette
dc.contributor.authorKlaine, Stephen J.
dc.contributor.authorHandy, Richard D.
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Teresa F.
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, Elijah J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-15T08:22:54Z
dc.date.available2017-05-15T08:22:54Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationSelck, H. et al. 2016. Nanomaterials in the aquatic environment: a European Union United States perspective on the status of ecotoxicity testing, research priorities, and challenges ahead. Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 35(5):1055-1067. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.3385]
dc.identifier.issn0730-7268
dc.identifier.issn1552-8618 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/23331
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.3385
dc.description.abstractThe European Union–United States Communities of Research were established in 2012 to provide a platform for scientists to develop a “shared repertoire of protocols and methods to overcome nanotechnology environmental health and safety (nanoEHS) research gaps and barriers” (www.us-eu.org/). Based on work within the Ecotoxicology Community of Research (2012–2015) the present Focus article provides an overview of the state of the art of nanomaterials (NMs) in the aquatic environment by addressing different research questions, with a focus on ecotoxicological test systems and the challenges faced when assessing NM hazards (e.g., uptake routes, bioaccumulation, toxicity, test protocols, and model organisms). The authors' recommendation is to place particular importance on studying the ecological effects of aged/weathered NMs, as-manufactured NMs, and NMs released from consumer products in addressing the following overarching research topics: 1) NM characterization and quantification in environmental and biological matrices; 2) NM transformation in the environment and consequences for bioavailability and toxicity; 3) alternative methods to assess exposure; 4) influence of exposure scenarios on bioavailability and toxicity; 5) development of more environmentally realistic bioassays; and 6) uptake, internal distribution, and depuration of NMs. Research addressing these key topics will reduce uncertainty in ecological risk assessment and support the sustainable development of nanotechnology
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectNano
dc.subjectNanomaterial
dc.subjectEcotoxicology
dc.subjectWater
dc.subjectSediment
dc.titleNanomaterials in the aquatic environment: a European Union United States perspective on the status of ecotoxicity testing, research priorities, and challenges ahead
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.researchID27878694 - Klaine, Stephen James


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record