Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorColetto, R.
dc.contributor.authorVan Niekerk, S.J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-29T13:49:43Z
dc.date.available2018-08-29T13:49:43Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9540-8161
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/30840
dc.descriptionMPhil, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campusen_US
dc.description.abstractThis article explores rehabilitating rationality in contemporary philosophy of science against the background of the objectivist/rationalist positions prevalent at the end of the 19th century. Subsequent changes of position are investigated by focusing on trends discernible in writings of 20th century philosophers of science. Here, a shift from rationalism to irrationalism and from objectivism to subjectivism occurred. The ensuing clash culminated into a yet unresolved impasse in contemporary philosophy of science. It is suggested that three mind-shifts may alleviate this unsatisfactory deadlock. Firstly, a better understanding of the need for a non-reductionist notion of rationality. Secondly, acknowledgment of the creational order as locus ordinis of rationality. Thirdly, an intensified awareness of modal and entitary abstraction.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNorth-West Universityen_US
dc.subjectRationalismen_US
dc.subjectirrationalismen_US
dc.subjectsubjectivismen_US
dc.subjectobjectivismen_US
dc.subjectrationalityen_US
dc.subjectreasonen_US
dc.subjectscienceen_US
dc.subjectphilosophy of scienceen_US
dc.titleRehabilitating rationality in contemporary philosophy of scienceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US
dc.contributor.researchID11659149 - Coletto, Renato (Supervisor)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record