Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlabi, Micheal Omotayo
dc.contributor.authorWichers, Harry
dc.contributor.authorKloppers, Cornelius P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-09T09:41:39Z
dc.date.available2020-03-09T09:41:39Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationAlabi, M.O. et al. 2019. Framework for effective additive manufacturing education: a case study of South African universities. Rapid prototyping journal, 26(5):801-826. [https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-02-2019-0041]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1355-2546
dc.identifier.issn1758-7670 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/34323
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RPJ-02-2019-0041/full/pdf?title=framework-for-effective-additive-manufacturing-education-a-case-study-of-south-african-universities
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-02-2019-0041
dc.description.abstractPurpose In this era of Fourth Industrial Revolution, also known as Industry 4.0, additive manufacturing (AM) has been recognized as one of the nine technologies of Industry 4.0 that will revolutionize different sectors (such as manufacturing and industrial production). Therefore, this study aims to focus on “Additive Manufacturing Education” and the primary aim of this study is to investigate the impacts of AM technology at selected South African universities and develop a proposed framework for effective AM education using South African universities as the case study. Design/methodology/approach Quantitative research approach was used in this study, that is, a survey (questionnaire) was designed specifically to investigate the impacts of the existing AM technology/education and the facilities at the selected South African universities. The survey was distributed to several students (undergraduate and postgraduate) and the academic staffs within the selected universities. The questionnaire contained structured questions based on five factors/variables and followed by two open-ended questions. The data were collected and analyzed using statistical tools and were interpreted accordingly (i.e. both the closed and open-ended questions). The hypotheses were stated, tested and accepted. In conclusion, the framework for AM education at the universities was developed. Findings Based on different literature reviewed on “framework for AM technology and education”, there is no specific framework that centers on AM education and this makes it difficult to find an existing framework for AM education to serve as a landscape to determine the new framework for AM education at the universities. Therefore, the results from this study made a significant contribution to the body of knowledge in AM, most especially in the area of education. The significant positive responses from the respondents have shown that the existing AM in-house facilities at the selected South African universities is promoting AM education and research activities. This study also shows that a number of students at the South African universities have access to AM/3D printing lab for design and research purposes. Furthermore, the findings show that the inclusion of AM education in the curriculum of both the science and engineering education is South Africa will bring very positive results. The introduction of a postgraduate degree in AM such as MSc or MEng in AM will greatly benefit the South African universities and different industries because it will increase the number of AM experts and professionals. Through literature review, this study was able to identify five factors (which includes sub-factors) that are suitable for the development of a framework for AM education, and this framework is expected to serve as base-line or building block for other universities globally to build/develop their AM journey. Research limitations/implications The survey was distributed to 200 participants and 130 completed questionnaires were returned. The target audience for the survey was mainly university students (both undergraduate and postgraduate) and the academics who have access to AM machines or have used the AM/3D printing lab/facilities on their campuses for both academic and research purposes. Therefore, one of the limitations of the survey is the limited sample size; however, the sample size for this survey is considered suitable for this type of research and would allow generalization of the findings. Nevertheless, future research on this study should use larger sample size for purpose of results generalization. In addition, this study is limited to quantitative research methodology; future study should include qualitative research method. Irrespective of any existing or developed framework, there is always a need to further improve the existing framework, and therefore, the proposed framework for AM education in this study contained only five factors/variables and future should include some other factors (AM commercialization, AM continuous Improvement, etc.) to further enhance the framework. Practical implications This study provides the readers and researchers within the STEM education, industry or engineering education/educators to see the importance of the inclusion of AM in the university curriculum for both undergraduate and postgraduate degrees. More so, this study serves as a roadmap for AM initiative at the universities and provides necessary factors to be considered when the universities are considering or embarking on AM education/research journey at their universities. It also serves as a guideline or platform for various investors or individual organization to see the need to invest in AM education.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmeralden_US
dc.subject3D printingen_US
dc.subjectAdditive manufacturingen_US
dc.subjectTechnologyen_US
dc.subjectIndustrial revolutionen_US
dc.subjectAdditive manufacturing educationen_US
dc.subjectSouth African universitiesen_US
dc.subjectSTEM educationen_US
dc.subjectFrameworken_US
dc.titleFramework for effective additive manufacturing education: a case study of South African universitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID25756982 - Alabi, Micheal Omotayo
dc.contributor.researchID10065350 - Wichers, Jacob Harm
dc.contributor.researchID20035411 - Kloppers, Cornelius Petrus


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record