Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRatz, Malcom
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-08T14:16:28Z
dc.date.available2020-10-08T14:16:28Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationRatz, M. 2019. Damages Arising from Contraventions of Competition Act89 of 1998. Potchefstroomse elektroniese regsblad = Potchefstroom electronic law journal, 2019(22):1-30. [http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a1529]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/35905
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a1529
dc.description.abstractPersons who have suffered loss or damage as a result of a prohibited practice in terms of the Competition Act89 of 1998 (the Act) have the right to recover such damage in the civil courts. This right is expressly provided for in section 65 of the Act. To date South Africa has failed to usher in an efficient and effective environment for section 65 civil damages actions, despite growing success being achieved by the competition authorities in uncovering and prosecuting firms for contraventions of the Act, including prohibitedpractices. Understanding how section 65 rights might be vindicated and whether South Africa's damages regime is adequate to deal with potentially complex damages actions within the realm of competition law contraventions, a starting point would be to gain certainty as to the classification of the nature of section 65 damages. This article seeks to evaluate the arguments of whether these damages actions should be properly classified as statutoryor delictualactions by the South African civil courts.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPER/PELJen_US
dc.subjectCompetition lawen_US
dc.subjectdamagesen_US
dc.subjectprivate competition damagesen_US
dc.subjectdelictualen_US
dc.subjectstatutoryen_US
dc.titleDamages Arising from Contraventions of Competition Act 89 of 1998en_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record