mirage

The quality of environmental management frameworks in South Africa / Marius Marais

Boloka/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Marais, Marius en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-08-30T10:14:08Z
dc.date.available 2011-08-30T10:14:08Z
dc.date.issued 2010 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10394/4574
dc.description Thesis (M. Environmental Management)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.
dc.description.abstract Environmental assessments and authorisations surrounding project level developments are often made in isolation, without consideration of the regional or strategic context within which individual developments are done. This research investigates the quality of Environmental Management Frameworks (EMF) as strategic environmental instrument. EMF is a unique South African instrument that was first conceptualised in 1989, enacted in 2006 and updated in 2010. EMFs were developed to map environmental sensitivity to aid the screening out of undesired developments in sensitive environments and to minimise unnecessary project level assessments in preferred development areas. EMFs form an important link between environmental assessment (EA) processes and planning strategies such as Spatial Development Frameworks (SDFs) and Integrated Development Plans (IDPs), due to their spatial output of environmental sensitivity maps and their ability to feed strategic assessment processes required by SDFs. They have a legal mandate which ensures their assimilation and use. This research uses a multiple case study approach to review seven EMF documents for their quality. The quality aspects identified are the process, methodology and documentation components, using the printed EMF documentation as primary information source. Quality review criteria were subsequently developed to investigate these inputs, using the legal mandate of EMF as basis. Each case was rated for compliance with the quality criteria using a six–level rating schedule. Further analyses were made by comparing the performance of cases against one another. Public participation emerged as the weakest component of EMF practice, while aspects of sensitivity analysis also performed weaker than other aspects. More focus is required on aligning scales and resolutions of map inputs, mapping methods and general integration of spatial data, especially those of adjoining districts. The need to substantiate a rationale for buffer determination also requires further refinement. The practice of conducting EMF is well established and it can be valuable in sustainable development planning and decisionmaking. Recommendations to enhance the sustainability outcomes and hence effectiveness of this instrument are made, as well as future research objectives for increasing its utility. en_US
dc.publisher North-West University
dc.subject Environmental management frameworks en_US
dc.subject EMF en_US
dc.subject Spatial development frameworks en_US
dc.subject SDF en_US
dc.subject Quality review en_US
dc.subject Performance evaluation en_US
dc.subject Sensitivity mapping en_US
dc.subject Environmental assessment en_US
dc.subject EA en_US
dc.subject Strategic assessment en_US
dc.title The quality of environmental management frameworks in South Africa / Marius Marais en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.description.thesistype Masters en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ETD@PUK [4890]
    This collection contains the original digitized versions of research conducted at the North-West University (Potchefstroom Campus)

Show simple item record

Search the NWU Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics