Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWolf, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-06T13:49:03Z
dc.date.available2011-09-06T13:49:03Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/4691
dc.description.abstractThe previous Westminster criminal justice system entailed a different kind of separation of powers insofar as it concerns the role of state prosecutors. In the Westminster system prosecutors are part of the executive branch, whereas they were a split–off from the judiciary in constitutional states and function like a de facto second organ of the third branch of state power. Currently executive interference in state prosecutions often leads to pre–trial inequality. A further difficulty arises from the unconsidered manner in which the former royal prerogative of pardoning was retained in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. It used to be a royal veto of judicial sentences in the constitutional monarchy of the former Westminster model. Although the corresponding veto of parliamentary legislation by the head of state did not survive into modern times, the pardoning power has not been discontinued. Section 84(2)(j) thus causes an irreconcilable conflict with section 165(5) of the Constitution which guarantees the legally binding force of judicial decisions. It undermines the rule of law and leads to post–trial inequality in the execution of sentences. The parole system, which dates back to 1959, likewise allows the executive to overrule judicial sentences and is in conflict with section 165(5). The perpetuation of the status quo in criminal justice is in effect leading to a re–Westminstering of the constitutional state.en_US
dc.subjectprosecutorsen_US
dc.subjectnolle prosequien_US
dc.subjectpre-trial equalityen_US
dc.subjectpost-trial equalityen_US
dc.subjectpardonen_US
dc.subjectparoleen_US
dc.subjectadministrative acten_US
dc.subjectadministration of justiceen_US
dc.subjectcriminal justiceen_US
dc.subjectjudicial poweren_US
dc.subjectprerogative poweren_US
dc.titlePre– and Post–Trial Equality in Criminal Justice in the Context of the Separation of Powersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record