Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCouzens, M
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-03T12:22:33Z
dc.date.available2012-09-03T12:22:33Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationCouzens, M. 2012. Procurement adjudication and the rights of children: Freedom Stationary (PTY) LTD v MEC for Education, Eastern Cape 2011 JOL 26927 (E). Potchefstroom electronic law journal (PELJ) = Potchefstroomse elektroniese regsblad (PER), 15(1):392-410 [http://www.nwu.ac.za/p-per/index.html]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/7213
dc.description.abstractChildren are heavily reliant on the services provided by the government and irregularities in public procurement processes are bound to affect the realisation of children's rights. In the Freedom Stationery (Pty) Ltd v The Member of the Executive Council for Education, Eastern Cape the Court was urged by the Centre for Child Law acting as an amicus curiae to consider children's right to education and their best interests when deciding on an interim interdict which would result in a delay in the provision of stationery to several schools in the Eastern Cape. This case note contains a summary of the case, some comments on the court's approach to the rights of children in procurement adjudication, and an assessment of the significance of the case for the development of children's rights in South Africa.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.subjectChildren's rightsen_US
dc.subjectThe right to educationen_US
dc.subjectThe best interests of the childen_US
dc.subjectPublic procurementen_US
dc.subjectProcurement adjudicationen_US
dc.titleProcurement adjudication and the rights of children: Freedom Stationary (PTY) LTD v MEC for Education, Eastern Cape 2011 JOL 26927 (E)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record