Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKruger, Reneéen_US
dc.descriptionThesis (M. Environmental Management)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2012.
dc.description.abstractIn order to make decisions to approve filling stations, an environmental impact assessment (EIA) needs to be conducted and evaluated by the competent authority. Although numerous filling stations have been authorised for operation, the quality of the EIA reports that form the basis for decision making has never been evaluated. The evaluation of the quality of EIA reports on filling station developments by means of an adapted Lee–Colley review package formed the basis of this research. The main conclusion was that the quality of the EIA reports for filling station developments, as reviewed by the adapted review package, is generally of a poor standard. This means that a decision to approve a new filling station is generally based on just enough information to the competent authority. The main deficiencies in the EIA reports related to site description, cumulative impacts and mitigation measures, while the environment description, identification of impacts, scoping of impacts, assessment of impact significance and emphasis (impacts) in the reports were of good quality. The results from the reviewed EIA’s correspond mostly with the literature on the review of EIA reports.en_US
dc.publisherNorth-West University
dc.subjectEnvironmental Impact Assessment (EIA)en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Impact Report (EIR)en_US
dc.subjectFilling stationen_US
dc.subjectReview packageen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectOmgewingsinvloedbepaling (OIB)en_US
dc.subjectOmgewingsimpakverslag (OIV)en_US
dc.titleA critical analysis of the quality of EIA reports for filling stations in South Africaen

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ETD@PUK [7487]
    This collection contains the original digitized versions of research conducted at the North-West University (Potchefstroom Campus)

Show simple item record