Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChanchitpricha, Chaunjit
dc.contributor.authorBond, Alan
dc.identifier.citationChanchitpricha, C. & Bond, A. 2013. Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes. Environmental impact assessment review. 43:65-72. []en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims at conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes through the development of a literature-based framework of criteria to measure impact assessment effectiveness. Four categories of effectiveness were established: procedural, substantive, transactive and normative, each containing a number of criteria; no studies have previously brought together all four of these categories into such a comprehensive, criteria-based framework and undertaken systematic evaluation of practice. The criteria can be mapped within a cycle/or cycles of evaluation, based on the ‘logic model’, at the stages of input, process, output and outcome to enable the identification of connections between the criteria across the categories of effectiveness. This framework is considered to have potential application in measuring the effectiveness of many impact assessment processes, including strategic environmental assessment (SEA), environmental impact assessment (EIA), social impact assessment (SIA) and health impact assessment (HIA).en_US
dc.subjectProcedural effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectsubstantive effectivenessen_US
dc.subjecttransactive effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectnormative effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectimpact assessment toolsen_US
dc.subjectlogic modelen_US
dc.titleConceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processesen_US

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record