Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVan Niekerk, Carmel
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-01T07:06:49Z
dc.date.available2015-09-01T07:06:49Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationVan Niekerk, C. 2015. Section 294 of the Children's Act: do roots really matter?. Potchefstroom electronic law journal (PELJ) = Potchefstroomse elektroniese regsblad (PER), 18(2):397-428 [http://www.nwu.ac.za/p-per/index.html]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/14343
dc.description.abstractSection 294 of the Children's Act 38 of 2005 currently only permits commissioning parents to engage in surrogacy arrangements in instances where they are able to provide a genetic link to their future offspring. This provision then excludes other infertile individuals, who due to the cause of their infertility are unable to provide genetic material, from engaging in surrogacy as a means of becoming parents, often at times when adoption as an alternative is not available to them. This article critically analyses section 294 and the issues it raises. In particular, it considers the constitutionality of section 294 and the remedies available to infertile parties who cannot meet the genetic link requirement. This article further considers the importance of genetic links in acquiring a child and the alternatives thereto, and concludes by proposing a way forward.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectSurrogacyen_US
dc.subjectSurrogate motherhood agreementen_US
dc.subjectIntention to parenten_US
dc.subjectGenetic linken_US
dc.subjectCommissioning parentsen_US
dc.subjectInfertileen_US
dc.titleSection 294 of the Children's Act: do roots really matter?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record