Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVan Staden, L.
dc.contributor.authorVan der Merwe, N.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-02T12:59:02Z
dc.date.available2016-02-02T12:59:02Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationVan Staden, L. & Van der Merwe, N. 2012. Capitalisation of borrowing costs: an investigation into technical uncertainties in IAS 23. South African journal of accounting research, 26(1):95-117. [http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rsar20/current]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1029-1954
dc.identifier.issn2376-3981 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/16115
dc.description.abstractThose who are not experts in the field of accounting will most probably be of the opinion that interest should be expensed and therefore reduce profits. However, for financial periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009, the capitalisation of borrowing costs (interest) incurred on certain qualifying assets became mandatory for companies applying International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Apart from the practical implications of this change, some technical questions remain unanswered by IAS 23 Borrowing Costs, and since it is now mandatory to capitalise borrowing costs, it might be worthwhile to take a deeper look at the requirements of this standard. The study reveals that knowledgeable Financial Accounting academics were quite divided in their opinions regarding the finer technical details of the revised standard, for example the period that constitutes a “substantial period of time” as mentioned in the standard when defining qualifying assets. These differences in opinion might prove that accountants with equal knowledge may interpret the standard differently, which might lead to confusion and inconsistency in external reporting; to at least some degree a possible infringement of the modern plea towards accounting harmonisation. The findings of this research could prompt standard-setters to provide clearer guidance in the revision of future standards on borrowing costs in various different accounting frameworks, or even of other standards with similar uncertainties. In the instances where participants did agree on the correct accounting treatment, the findings in this research could also be used as guidance for what the correct accounting treatment should be for various scenarios. This could be useful, amongst others, to accountants in practice, auditors, textbook and guidance document authors, university lecturers and providers of continuing professional development (CPD) trainingen_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rsar20/current
dc.description.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10291954.2012.11435165
dc.description.uriDOI:10.1080/10291954.2012.11435165
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectBorrowing costsen_US
dc.subjectcapitalisationen_US
dc.subjectIAS 23en_US
dc.subjectInternational Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)en_US
dc.subjectqualifying asseten_US
dc.subjecttechnical uncertaintiesen_US
dc.subjectUnited States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP)en_US
dc.titleCapitalisation of borrowing costs: an investigation into technical uncertainties in IAS 23en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID12978833 - Van Staden, Liani
dc.contributor.researchID12081671 - Van der Merwe, Nico


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record