Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSpan, Kees C.L.
dc.contributor.authorSchalk, René
dc.contributor.authorLuijkx, Katrien G.
dc.contributor.authorSchols, Jos M.G.A
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T13:22:44Z
dc.date.available2016-04-19T13:22:44Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationSpan, K.C.L. et al. 2012. What governance roles do municipalities use in Dutch local social support networks? Public management review, 14(8):1175-1194. [http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rpxm20/current]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-9037
dc.identifier.issn1471-9045 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/16986
dc.description.abstractUntil now, there is no consensus about variations in governance roles. This consensus is necessary to enable researchers to examine how network are governed well. In this article, the governance roles are considered to be clusters of consistent choices on a top-down versus bottom-up continuum, regarding nine governance activities. Our results reveal that three governance roles can be discerned: top-down, intermediate and bottom-up governance roles. Furthermore, these roles are applied by municipalities with specific (network) characteristics. Our results pen the black box of network governance and might facilitate municipalities to make choices regarding their role in the new network eraen_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14719037.2012.664013#abstract
dc.description.uriDOI:10.1080/14719037.2012.664013
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectNetwork governance rolesen_US
dc.subjectlocal public networksen_US
dc.subjectlatent cluster class analysisen_US
dc.subjectnetwork characteristicsen_US
dc.titleWhat governance roles do municipalities use in Dutch local social support networks?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record