Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeeters, Margot
dc.contributor.authorZondervan-Zwijnenburg, Marielle
dc.contributor.authorVink, Gerko
dc.contributor.authorVan de Schoot, Rens
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-16T07:11:35Z
dc.date.available2017-02-16T07:11:35Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationPeeters, M. et al 2015. How to handle missing data: A comparison of different approaches. European Journal Of Developmental Psychology, 12(4):377–394. [http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/pedp20/current#.VC1J_R]
dc.identifier.issn1740–5629
dc.identifier.issn1740–5610 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/20372
dc.description.abstractMany researchers face the problem of missing data in longitudinal research. Especially, high risk samples are characterized by missing data which can complicate analyses and the interpretation of results. In the current study, our aim was to find the most optimal and best method to deal with the missing data in a specific study with many missing data on the outcome variable. Therefore, different techniques to handle missing data were evaluated, and a solution to efficiently handle substantial amounts of missing data was provided. A simulation study was conducted to determine the most optimal method to deal with the missing data. Results revealed that multiple imputation (MI) using predictive mean matching was the most optimal method with respect to lowest bias and the smallest confidence interval (CI) while maintaining power. Listwise deletion and last observation carried backward also scored acceptable with respect to bias; however, CIs were much larger and sample size almost halved using these methods. Longitudinal research in high risk samples could benefit from using MI in future research to handle missing data. The paper ends with a checklist for handling missing data. 
dc.description.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/toc/pedp20/12/4?nav=tocList
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2015.1049526
dc.description.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17405629.2015.1049526
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
dc.subjectMissing data
dc.subjectMultiple imputation
dc.subjectHigh risk sample
dc.subjectLongitudinal research
dc.titleHow to handle missing data: A comparison of different approaches
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.researchID25959565 – Van de Schoot, Adrianus Gerardus Joanes


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record