Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLouw, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorDuvenhage, André
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-15T08:59:16Z
dc.date.available2017-05-15T08:59:16Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationLouw, G. & Duvenhage, A. 2016. The Traditional Health Practitioners Act (No 22 of 2007): a South African Constitutional mishap? Ensovoort, 36(10:2):1-11. [http://ensovoort.com/the-traditional-health-practitioners-act-no-22-of-2007-a-south-african-constitutional-mishap/]
dc.identifier.issn0257-2036
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/23597
dc.identifier.urihttp://ensovoort.com/the-traditional-health-practitioners-act-no-22-of-2007-a-south-african-constitutional-mishap/
dc.descriptionEnter any additional information or requests for the Library here.
dc.description.abstractBackground:The Traditional Health Practitioners Act (Act No 22, 2007), which elicits controversy in the South African healthcare and public sector since proclamation, went untested through the legislature, driven inside the post-1994 socio-political dispensation.. No previous in-depth studies have been identified. Aims: The aim of this study was to determine and to reflect the Act's long term legal implications for the already statutory health professions and the public: specific with the focus on the Constitution and other legislations and possible ways to oppose it. Methods: This is an exploratory and descriptive research, in line with the modern-day history approach of investigation and reviewing research, using contemporary reports, news papers and articles as primary resources to reflect on the situation, thinking, opinions, trends and activities around Act No 22 and its implications on the Constitution and citizen's rights. The focus was also to put Act No 22 in a future in perspective. Findings are represented in narrative form. Results: Act No 22 (2007) was promulgated without an applicable and appropriate scientific needs-analysis. The Act seems to stand to a great extent in conflict with the Constitution as well as various other Acts, like the Witchcraft Suppression Act (No 3, 1957). Conclusions: The Act is still today, nearly a decade after promulgation, not fully active. It is a Constitutional mishap. Notwithstanding its constitutional controversy, the Act's political sanction by governmental agencies and political leaders will ensure that it will not vanish easily from the South African law books.
dc.language.isoen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJournal for cultural studies
dc.subjectApartheid
dc.subjectconstitution
dc.subjecthuman rights
dc.subjectpost-1994 dispensation
dc.subjecttraditional healer and religions
dc.titleThe Traditional Health Practitioners Act (No 22 of 2007): a South African Constitutional mishap?
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.researchID10197125 - Duvenhage, André
dc.contributor.researchID10056394 - Louw, Gabriel Petrus


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record