On a new method for constructing bootstrap confidence bounds
Abstract
It is well-known that the standard methods for constructing bootstrap confidence bounds
or intervals are in many situations not sufficiently accurate, that is, coverage probabilities
converge to the nominal level at unsatisfactory rates. We propose a new method, based on
sample splitting, for constructing higher-order accurate bootstrap confidence bounds for a
parameter appearing in the regular smooth function model introduced by Bhattacharya and
Ghosh (1978).
It has been demonstrated by Hall (1986, 1988, 1992) that the well-known percentile-t
bootstrap confidence bound typically incurs a coverage error of order O(n-1), with n being
the sample size. Our version of the percentile-t bound reduces this coverage error to order
O(n-3/2) and in some cases to O(n-2). Furthermore, whereas the standard percentile bounds
typically incur coverage error of O(n-1/2), the new percentile bounds have reduced error of
O(n-1). We show that equal-tailed confidence intervals with coverage error at most O(n-2)
may be obtained from the newly proposed bounds, as opposed to the typical error O(n-1) of
the standard intervals.
In the case where the parameter of interest is the population mean we derive, for each
confidence bound, the exact coefficient of the leading term in an asymptotic expansion of
the coverage error, although similar results may be obtained for other parameters such as
the variance, the correlation coefficient, and the ratio of two means. We also derive similar
results for the case where the slope parameter in a linear regression model is of interest,
showing that the good properties of the new percentile-t method carry over to regression
problems.
Results of independent interest are derived, such as a generalisation of a delta method
by Cramér (1946) and Hurt (1976), as well as an expression for an Edgeworth polynomial
arising in the linear regression setup.
The study is concluded with a modest simulation study, which illustrates the behaviour
of the new confidence bounds for small to moderate sample sizes