Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGeldenhuys, Judith
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-28T13:21:31Z
dc.date.available2017-09-28T13:21:31Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationPotchefstroom electronic law journal (PELJ) = Potchefstroomse elektoniese regsblad (PER), 20: [http://www.nwu.ac.za/p-per/index.html]en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/25685
dc.description.abstractAutomatic termination is an accepted means of terminating fixed-term employment relationships. The use of "automatic termination" clauses in employment contracts has become commonplace. Awareness of the potential for abuse of these contractual mechanisms is increasing. Recent case law on the issue indicates that the public policy, which serves as test for validity and/or enforceability of "automatic termination" clauses has changed. The impetus for the protection of "non-standard" or atypical employees is underscored by policy considerations that have been incorporated by the recent legislative amendments. These developments may very well place a heavier burden than before on employers who opt to rely on "automatic termination" clauses to sustain an argument in favour or their validity and/ or enforcement.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectautomatic terminationen_US
dc.subject"automatic termination" clauseen_US
dc.subjectfixed-term contracten_US
dc.subjectcontractual waiver or rightsen_US
dc.subjectpublic policyen_US
dc.subjectpublic interesten_US
dc.subject"non-standard" employeesen_US
dc.subjecttemporary employment servicesen_US
dc.subjectcontracting out of statutory protectionen_US
dc.titleThe changing public policy and automatic termination of fixed-term employment contracts in South Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record