The cross-tissue metabolic response of abalone (Haliotis midae) to functional hypoxia

View/ Open
Date
2018Author
Venter, Leonie
Loots, Du Toit
Mienie, Lodewyk J.
Jansen van Rensburg, Peet J.
Mason, Shayne
Lindeque, Jeremie Z.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Functional hypoxia is a stress condition caused by the abalone itself as
a result of increased muscle activity, which generally necessitates the
employment of anaerobic metabolism if the activity is sustained for
prolonged periods. With that being said, abalone are highly reliant on
anaerobic metabolism to provide partial compensation for energy
production during oxygen-deprived episodes. However, current
knowledge on the holistic metabolic response for energy metabolism
during functional hypoxia, and the contribution of different metabolic
pathways and various abalone tissues towards the overall
accumulation of anaerobic end-products in abalone are scarce.
Metabolomics analysis of adductor muscle, foot muscle, left gill, right
gill, haemolymph and epipodial tissue samples indicated that South
African abalone (Haliotis midae) subjected to functional hypoxia
utilises predominantly anaerobic metabolism, and depends on all of
the main metabolite classes (proteins, carbohydrates and lipids) for
energy supply. Functional hypoxia caused increased levels of
anaerobic end-products: lactate, alanopine, tauropine, succinate and
alanine. Also, elevation in arginine levels was detected, confirming that
abalone use phosphoarginine to generate energy during functional
hypoxia. Different tissues showed varied metabolic responses to
hypoxia, with functional hypoxia showing excessive changes in the
adductor muscle and gills. From this metabolomics investigation, it
becomes evident that abalone are metabolically able to produce
sufficient amounts of energy when functional hypoxia is experienced.
Also, tissue interplay enables the adjustment of H. midae energy
requirements as their metabolism shifts from aerobic to anaerobic
respiration during functional hypoxia.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10394/26681https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.031070
http://bio.biologists.org/content/biolopen/7/3/bio031070.full.pdf