Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Robbie
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-15T07:49:59Z
dc.date.available2018-06-15T07:49:59Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationRobinson, R. 2018. The legal nature of the embryo: legal subject or legal object? Potchefstroomse elektroniese regsblad = Potchefstroom electronic law journal, 2018(21)1-31. [https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a2914]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/27572
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a2914
dc.description.abstractThis contribution addresses the question regarding the legal nature of a cryopreserved embryo. Such preservation is a relatively modern development in the medical field. Neither Tennessee (USA) law nor European law provides an acceptable explanation regarding its legal nature. It is argued herein that this is mainly due to the fact that rather unscientific language is applied. It is suggested that the using of concise legal terminology may contribute to a better understanding. The terms legal subject and object and legal subjectivity are well-known and have definite legal content. By drawing an analogy between the legal status of an infant and such embryos, the conclusion is reached that embryos are not legal subjects sui iuris but indeed share the legal subjectivity of their parents.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPERen_US
dc.subjectEmbryoen_US
dc.subjectlegal subjectivityen_US
dc.subjectlegal subjecten_US
dc.subjectlegal objecten_US
dc.subjectcryopreserved ovaen_US
dc.subjectpersonen_US
dc.subjectpropertyen_US
dc.subjectlegal statusen_US
dc.subjectfoetusen_US
dc.titleThe legal nature of the embryo: legal subject or legal object?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record