Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNaudé, Wim
dc.contributor.authorRossouw, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorKrugell, Waldoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-04T15:33:31Z
dc.date.available2010-08-04T15:33:31Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.citationNaudé, W. et al. 2009. The non-monetary quality of city life in South Africa. Habitat international, 33(4):319-326, Oct. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.habitatint.2008.08.004]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0360-1315
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/3237
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.habitatint.2008.08.004
dc.description.abstractIn contrast to most research on the non-monetary quality of life, which relies on subjective indicators, we construct objective measures of the non-monetary quality of life using regression methods, for South Africa's cities. We also analyse the extent to which the various cities have been able to turn improvements in per capita incomes (monetary quality of life) into non-monetary quality of life – as reflected for instance in a better environment, higher literacy and longer lives. When monetary quality of life measures are used for South Africa's cities, the ranking in 2004 was led by Johannesburg, Tshwane, Ekurhuleni, Cape Town, Durban and Port Elizabeth. However when residuals from a regression of per capita income on (HDI) are used as a measure of non-monetary quality of life (i.e. the proportion of HDI not explained by variation in incomes), coastal cities tend to obtain generally higher rankings, with Cape Town ranked first, followed by Ekurhuleni, Durban, Port Elizabeth and then Johannesburg and Tshwane.en_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.titleThe non-monetary quality of city life in South Africaen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record