Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKwiecien, Susan Y.
dc.contributor.authorHowatson, Glyn
dc.contributor.authorMcHugh, Malachy P.
dc.contributor.authorGoodall, Stuart
dc.contributor.authorHicks, Kirsty M.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-07T07:40:12Z
dc.date.available2019-11-07T07:40:12Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationKwiecien, S.Y. et al. 2019. Exploring the efficacy of a safe cryotherapy alternative: physiological temperature changes from cold-water immersion versus prolonged cooling of phase-change material. International journal of sports physiology and performance, 14(9):1288-1296. [https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0763]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1555-0265
dc.identifier.issn555-0273 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/33567
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/ijspp/14/9/article-p1288.xml
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0763
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the effectiveness between cold-water immersion (CWI) and phase-change-material (PCM) cooling on intramuscular, core, and skin-temperature and cardiovascular responses. Methods: In a randomized, crossover design, 11 men completed 15 min of 15°C CWI to the umbilicus and 2-h recovery or 3 h of 15°C PCM covering the quadriceps and 1 h of recovery, separated by 24 h. Vastus lateralis intramuscular temperature at 1 and 3 cm, core and skin temperature, heart-rate variability, and thermal comfort were recorded at baseline and 15-min intervals throughout treatment and recovery. Results: Intramuscular temperature decreased (P < .001) during and after both treatments. A faster initial effect was observed from 15 min of CWI (Δ: 4.3°C [1.7°C] 1 cm; 5.5°C [2.1°C] 3 cm; P = .01). However, over time (2 h 15 min), greater effects were observed from prolonged PCM treatment (Δ: 4.2°C [1.9°C] 1 cm; 2.2°C [2.2°C] 3 cm; treatment × time, P = .0001). During the first hour of recovery from both treatments, intramuscular temperature was higher from CWI at 1 cm (P = .013) but not 3 cm. Core temperature deceased 0.25° (0.32°) from CWI (P = .001) and 0.28°C (0.27°C) from PCM (P = .0001), whereas heart-rate variability increased during both treatments (P = .001), with no differences between treatments. Conclusions: The magnitude of temperature reduction from CWI was comparable with PCM, but intramuscular temperature was decreased for longer during PCM. PCM cooling packs offer an alternative for delivering prolonged cooling whenever application of CWI is impractical while also exerting a central effect on core temperature and heart rateen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHuman Kineticsen_US
dc.subjectRecoveryen_US
dc.subjectThermoregulationen_US
dc.subjectCold therapyen_US
dc.subjectHydrotherapyen_US
dc.subjectIce bathen_US
dc.titleExploring the efficacy of a safe cryotherapy alternative: physiological temperature changes from cold-water immersion versus prolonged cooling of phase-change materialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID26084759 - Howatson, Glyn


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record