Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMarais, J.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDu Plooy, Daniel Lourensen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-21T14:51:10Z
dc.date.available2020-02-21T14:51:10Z
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6618-7419en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/34159
dc.descriptionMEng (Mechanical Engineering), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus
dc.description.abstractSouth African mines can be up to four kilometres deep, and they are continually extending to keep up with production targets as mining resources get depleted. High electricity costs and additional resources required to mine at greater depths are influencing the profitability of deep-level mines. Furthermore, as deep-level mines mature, the efficiency of compressed air networks deteriorate at a significant pace. The compressed air required to produce one tonne of ore has more than doubled in the past decade. Additionally, neglected compressed air networks result in pressure drops of up to 30%, which adversely effects production. Comprehensive manual audits are usually conducted to identify causes of compressed air inefficiency. However, these audits are not practical in an extensive underground network. This study suggests a novel localised benchmarking methodology to locate and manage factors that contribute to the deterioration of the compressed air network efficiency. The developed methodology was implemented on South African deep-level mines for validation purposes. The proposed methodology was able to identify underground sections with sizeable compressed air inefficiencies. The results were compared with those of conventional audit methods. It was found that the newly developed methodology was able to identify 80% of the operational improvement opportunities identified by auditing the entire underground network. The value of the newly developed methodology is evident when one considers that inefficiencies were located in less than 20% of the time it takes to conduct comprehensive audits. Systematically implementing the methodology on a case study resulted in highlighted electricity cost savings of R7.4 million per annum while a 19% increase in production was observed. The newly developed methodology can have a significant effect on the way underground compressed air networks are maintained. The methodology developed in this study was successfully published as a research article in the journal Sustainable Production and Consumption. The addition to the knowledge base greatly reduced audit times which will serve as a motivation for mine managers to audit underground sections more frequently. Frequent audits will result in improved service delivery and electricity cost savings of the compressed air system.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNorth-West University (South Africa)en_US
dc.subjectBenchmarkingen_US
dc.subjectCompressed air usageen_US
dc.subjectData procurementen_US
dc.subjectIntra planten_US
dc.titleDevelopment of a local benchmarking strategy to identify inefficient compressed air usage in deep-level minesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US
dc.contributor.researchID12609900 - Marais, Johannes Hendry (Supervisor)en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record