Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarx, Sanette
dc.contributor.authorVenter, Roelf
dc.contributor.authorKarmee, Sanjib Kumar
dc.contributor.authorLouw, Jaco
dc.contributor.authorTruter, Chantelle
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-31T09:00:06Z
dc.date.available2020-07-31T09:00:06Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationMarx, S. et al. 2020. Biofuels from spent coffee grounds: comparison of processing routes. Biofuels, (In press). [https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2020.1793538]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1759-7269
dc.identifier.issn1759-7277 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/35430
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17597269.2020.1793538
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2020.1793538
dc.description.abstractBulk fuel was produced from spent coffee grounds (SCG) using different oil extraction and fuel production methods. The highest oil yield (30.2%) and energy efficiency (50%) from continuous hydrothermal liquefaction (CHTL) of the SCG, in water as a solvent, also had the lowest calorific value (37.4 MJ/kg). Oil from traditional hexane oil extraction had the highest calorific value (HHV) (38.7 MJ/kg). Renewable diesel yields through hydrotreatment of extracted oils were consistently higher than biodiesel yields through enzymatic transesterification of the same oils. The highest renewable diesel yield (15.8%) from batch HTL derived bio-oil had the highest calorific value (46.2 MJ/kg). However, the highest kerosene yield (9%) was obtained from in situ renewable diesel production through direct hydrotreatment of the SCG. The study showed that hydrothermal liquefaction was more efficient in producing oil from SCG than traditional solvent extraction but at the cost of losing valuable phytosterols present in the feedstock. As a bulk fuel, renewable diesel had a higher energy value than biodiesel, making it easier to blend into existing transportation fuels. The study provides useful information for the development of a sustainable waste-based bio-refinery in terms of attainable yields and processing optionsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectSpent coffee groundsen_US
dc.subjectHydrotreatmenten_US
dc.subjectTransesterificationen_US
dc.subjectIn-situen_US
dc.subjectBiodieselen_US
dc.subjectRenewable dieselen_US
dc.titleBiofuels from spent coffee grounds: comparison of processing routesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID10216847 - Marx, Sanette
dc.contributor.researchID10303685 - Venter, Roelof Jacobus
dc.contributor.researchID28232100 - Karmee, Sanjib Kumar
dc.contributor.researchID24927074 - Truter, Chantelle


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record