Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRobinson, T.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBoshoff, M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-13T05:44:54Z
dc.date.available2020-11-13T05:44:54Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7242-6666en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/36330
dc.descriptionMSW (Forensic Practice), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus
dc.description.abstractIt is critical that a child’s voice is heard in care and contact disputes before any important decisions are made as to future care and contact arrangements. In South Africa, the Family Advocate Office was established to form the concept of collaborative assessment by professionals (family advocates and social workers) with specialized skills, training and education. Due consideration should be given to the views and wishes of minor children caught up in such disputes as per legal authority (The Children’s Act 38 of 2005, as amended) see South Africa (2005). Problems currently experienced regarding the child-assessment relates to the lack of skills and competencies of social workers, lack of the use of multiple data sources, efficient techniques, tools and a framework of criteria for assessment, as well as lack of a protocol or interview structure. The mentioned problems in child assessments are found locally, but also internationally. The study aims to obtain a comprehensive understanding of current child-assessment practices within the Family Advocate Office. A quantitative and descriptive survey design in the form of a self-designed survey was used to collect data. The population of this study includes family counsellors duly appointed by the Family Advocate Office in South Africa. The findings suggest that the current child-assessment practices are not adding to a standardized, quality product which can be widely accepted by Family Courts in South Africa.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNorth-West University (South Africa)en_US
dc.subjectCare and contact
dc.subjectchild
dc.subjectassessment
dc.subjectbest practices
dc.subjectfamily counsellor
dc.subjectfamily advocate office
dc.titleChild assessment practices in the Family Advocate Officeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US
dc.contributor.researchID21936137 - Robinson, Tanya Marie (Supervisor)en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record