Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRautenbach, Christa
dc.contributor.authorDu Plessis, Anél
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-08T07:47:15Z
dc.date.available2011-07-08T07:47:15Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationRautenbach, C. & Du Plessis, A.A. 2009. Fragmentation: Friend or foe in the effective implementation of the Cultural Diversity Convention in South Africa? South African Yearbook of International Law, 34:132-158 [http://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_sayil.html]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0379-8895
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/4260
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_sayil.html
dc.description.abstractIt seems as if South Africa has never been as energetically involved in the international law-making arena as she was in the making of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions 2005 (the CDC). The CDC is the first legally binding international document protecting cultural diversity. It was adopted by UNESCO on 20 October 2005 and ratified by South Africa on 21 December 2006, three months before it entered into force on 18 March 2007.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVerLoren van Themaat Centre for Public Law Studies (UNISA)en_US
dc.titleFragmentation: Friend or foe in the effective implementation of the Cultural Diversity Convention in South Africa?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID11086890 - Rautenbach, Christa
dc.contributor.researchID11731958 - Du Plessis, Alida Anél


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record