Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlbertus, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-26T11:13:59Z
dc.date.available2011-08-26T11:13:59Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/4501
dc.description.abstractThe case of Johncom Media Investments Limited v M 2009 4 SA 7 (CC) required of the Constitutional Court to strike a balance between the rights to privacy and the right to freedom of expression as a consequence of section 12 of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979. According to the Court, it felt that the "remedy" it provided was the best under the circumstances. However, there are certain concerns regarding the Court?s judgment which require clarification, possibly through legislative intervention.en_US
dc.subjectSection 12 of the Divorce Acten_US
dc.subjectright to freedom of expressionen_US
dc.subjectright to privacyen_US
dc.subjectLaw Reform Commission Reporten_US
dc.titleHas the Balance been Struck The Decision in Johncom Media Investments Limited v M 2009 4 SA 7 (CC)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record