Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFerreira, G.M.
dc.contributor.authorPeach, Joseph Vuyo
dc.date.accessioned2008-11-27T07:10:45Z
dc.date.available2008-11-27T07:10:45Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/58
dc.descriptionThesis (LL.M. (Public Law))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2004.
dc.description.abstractBefore 1994 administrative law was dominated by parliamentary supremacy which dictated that Parliament is the supreme law-making authority in the state. This position was radically changed by the new democratic order. To protect the rights of citizens a Bill of Rights was introduced in South Africa. This research focuses on the uncertainty pertaining to the application of the audi alteram partem rule to the proceedings of commissions of inquiry. Section 24 of the interim Constitution, section 33 of the final Constitution and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 were introduced to safeguard the individual against unfair administrative action. These legislative measures as well as applicable case law are analysed in order to establish whether they have brought about greater clarity concerning the application of the audi alteram partem rule to theproceedings of commissions of inquiry.
dc.publisherNorth-West University
dc.subjectAdministrative lawen
dc.subjectAudi alteram partemen
dc.subjectBill of Rightsen
dc.subjectCommissionsen
dc.subjectCommon lawen
dc.subjectConstitutionen
dc.subjectConstitutional Courten
dc.subjectConstitutional Stateen
dc.subjectExisting rightsen
dc.subjectFairnessen
dc.subjectLegitimate expectationen
dc.subjectNatural justiceen
dc.subjectPrejudiceen
dc.subjectProcedureen
dc.subjectRightsen
dc.subjectRuleen
dc.titleThe application of the audi alteram partem rule to the proceedings of commissions of inquiryen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.description.thesistypeMasters


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record